SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

H.K. SEMA,P.K. BALASUBRAMANYAN
UNION OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
TATA TELESERVICES(MAHARASHTRA) LTD. – Respondent


Advocates:
MANIK KARANJAWALA

http://JUDIS.NIC.IN

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Page 1 of 8

CASE NO.:

Appeal (civil) 1033 of 2004

PETITIONER:

UNION OF INDIA

RESPONDENT:

TATA TELESERVICES (MAHARASHTRA) LTD

DATE OF JUDGMENT: 23/08/2007

BENCH:

H.K. SEMA & P.K. BALASUBRAMANYAN

JUDGMENT:

J U D G M E N T

P.K. BALASUBRAMANYAN, J.

1. This appeal by the Union of India, the respondent in

a proceeding before the Telecom Disputes Settlement &

Appellate Tribunal (for short, \023the TDSAT\024) in a petition filed

by the respondent herein under Section 14 of the Telecom

Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 (for short \023the Act\024) is

under Section 18 of the Act. The respondent approached the

TDSAT praying for a declaration that the action of the Union

of India in raising a claim and in recovering the amount as per

its demand dated 10.8.1999, was bad in law and be set aside,

for a declaration that the set off made by invoking condition 19

of the licence the respondent had with the appellant in respect

of the Maharashtra Service Area was illegal and unauthorised

and for setting aside the same, for directing the appellant to

refund an amount of Rs.50 crores together with interest from

the date of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top