SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

NANHAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


Advocates:
PREM MALHOTRAKAMAL MOHAN GUPTA

1

REPORTABLE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2496 OF 2009

NANHAR & ORS.

.. APPELLANT(S)

vs.

STATE OF HARYANA

.. RESPONDENT(S)

WITH

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2497 OF 2009

O R D E R

1.

Appellant five in number, in both the

appeals, feeling aggrieved by the judgment and

order of conviction dated 7/5/2008 passed in

Criminal Appeal No.919-DB/2006 by Division Bench

of High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh,

arising out of the judgment and order of conviction

dated 24/11/2006 and order of sentence dated

2

25/11/2006 pronounced by Additional Sessions Judge,

Bhiwani, convicting them for commission of offences

under Sections 302/149 of the IPC and awarding

sentence to undergo RI for life, together with

fine of Rs.2,000/-, are before us challenging the

same on variety of grounds.

2.

It may be mentioned herein that initially

charge-sheet was filed only against four accused

namely Nanhar, Virender @ Binder, Rampat and Rajbir

@ Meda under Sections 306/34 IPC. The name of the

fifth accused Umed Singh was added subsequently by

the Trial Co

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top