UNION OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
RAVI PRAKASH GUPTA – Respondent
SLP(Crl) No.-000020 / 2021
13-09-2021
ITEM NO.20 Court 8 (Video Conferencing) SECTION II
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s).20/2021
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04-03-2020
in BN No.12674/2019 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At
Allahabad, Lucknow Bench)
UNION OF INDIA Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
RAVI PRAKASH GUPTA Respondent(s)
(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.405/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING
C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT, IA No.405/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM
FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT)
WITH
SLP(Crl) No.557/2021 (II)
(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.7616/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING
O.T.)
SLP(Crl) No.4071/2021 (II)
(IA No. 65888/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED
JUDGMENT)
SLP(Crl) No.4420/2021 (II)
(IA No.71004/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED
JUDGMENT)
SLP(Crl) No.4419/2021 (II)
(IA No.70997/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED
JUDGMENT)
Date : 13-09-2021 These matters were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE
For Petitioner(s)
Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, ASG
Mr. K.M. Nataraj, ASG
Mr. Akshay Amritanshu, Adv.
Mr. Rajat Nair, Adv.
Mr. Mukul Singh, Adv.
Mr. Subranshi Padhi, Adv.
Ms. B. Sunita Rao, Adv.
Mr. P.V. Yogeswaran, Adv.
Mr. Adit Khorana, Adv.
Mr. B.K. Satija, Adv.
Mr. B. V. Balaram Das, AOR
Digitally signed by
Rachna
Date: 2021.09.13
16:25:18 IST
Reason:
Signature Not Verified
For Respondent(s)
Mr. Ram Sankar, Adv.
Ms. K. Vaijanthi, Adv.
Mr. G. Jaisingh, Adv.
Ms. G. Chitrakala, Adv.
Ms. Sujatha Bhagathi, Adv.
Mr. Yusuf, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
SLP (Crl.) No(s).20/2021 & SLP(Crl) No.557/2021
Respondents have been served and appearing through their
counsel.
SLP(Crl) No.4071/2021, SLP(Crl) No.4420/2021 & SLP(Crl)
No.4419/2021
Office report indicates that the respondent(s) in each of the
cases have not been served. Learned counsel for the petitioner may
take fresh steps to serve the unserved respondent(s). In addition,
the respondent(s) may be served through Judicial Magistrate
concerned.
List after four weeks.
(ARJUN BISHT) (PRADEEP KUMAR)
(ASHWANI THAKUR)
(COURT MASTER (SH)
(BRANCH OFFICER)
AR-CUM-PS
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.