SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

UTTAM – Appellant
Versus
SAUBHAG SINGH . – Respondent


Advocates:
PRATIBHA JAIN

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

R.P.(C) NO. 3396/2016 IN C.A. NO. 2360/2016

UTTAM

PETITIONER(S)

VERSUS

SAUBHAG SINGH AND ORS.

RESPONDENT(S)

O R D E R

Upon perusing the paper book, it has come to our

notice that there is a delay of 146 days in filing this

review petition and we do not find any justifiable

reasons to condone the delay.

Even on merits, we have perused the Review Petition

and the connected papers with meticulous care and do not

find any justifiable reason to entertain this review

petition.

The Review Petition is, accordingly, dismissed on

the ground of delay as well as on merits.

Pending application(s), if any, shall stand

disposed of.

.................................J.

[KURIAN JOSEPH]

.................................J.

[ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN]

NEW DELHI;

FEBRUARY 21, 2017.

Digitally signed by

NARENDRA PRASAD

Date: 2017.02.25

11:36:52 IST

Reason:

Signature Not Verified

CHAMBER MATTER SECTION IV

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

R.P.(C) NO. 3396/2016 IN C.A. NO. 2360/2016

UT

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top