SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

A. ANDISAMY CHETTIAR – Appellant
Versus
A. SUBBURAJ CHETTIAR – Respondent


Advocates:
NARESH KUMAR

ITEM NO.43 COURT NO.4 SECTION XII

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.25791/2016

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 08/06/2016

in CRPMD No. 1094/2016 passed by the High Court of Madras at

Madurai)

A. ANDISAMY CHETTIAR Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

A. SUBBURAJ CHETTIAR Respondent(s)

(With interim relief and office report)

Date : 09/09/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN

For Petitioner(s)

Mr. S. Nanda Kumar, Adv.

Mr. Parivesh Singh, Adv.

Mr. P. Srinivasan, Adv.

Mr. Pratik Gupta, Adv.

Mr. Naresh Kumar, AOR

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, we

think it appropriate that the petitioner instead of pursuing

this remedy, should reserve his rights to challenge the final

judgment of the appellate court. Li

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top