SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

VIJAY NARAYAN THATTE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA . – Respondent


Advocates:
VIKAS MEHTASHIVAJI M. JADHAV

1

REPORTABLE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5614 OF 2009

(Arising out of SLP(C) No. 2703 of 2008)

Vijay Narayan Thatte & Ors.

....

Appellants

Versus

State of Maharashtra & Ors.

....

Respondents

O R D E R

1.

Heard Shri Harish Salve and Shri Shyam Divan,

learned senior counsel for the appellants and learned

Attorney General of India and Shri Shekhar Naphade, learned

learned senior counsel for the respondents.

2.

Leave granted.

3.

This appeal has been filed against the impugned

judgment and order dated 21.01.2008 passed by a Division

Bench of the High Court of Bombay whereby the writ petition

filed by the appellants herein has been rejected.

4.

The facts in brief are that a Notification under

Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter for

short 'the Act') was issued in respect of the land in

question on 29.8.2002. Thereafter a Notification under

2

Section 6 of the Act was issued on 18.6.2003. The said

Notification under Section 6 was challenged and the writ

petition filed by the appellants was allowed on 20.1.2004

and the Not

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top