SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
MANJUSHA DEVI – Appellant
Versus
PANKAJ GUPTA – Respondent
SLP(C) No.-020842 / 2021
04-01-2022
MANOJ K. MISHRA
ITEM NO.18 Court 12 (Video Conferencing) SECTION XI
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 20842/2021
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 18-01-2021 in
FAFO No. 1708/2020 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad)
MANJUSHA DEVI Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
PANKAJ GUPTA & ANR. Respondent(s)
(FOR ADMISSION/I.R. and IA No.165846/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF
THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.165847/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)
WITH
SLP(C) No. 21014/2021 (XI)
(FOR ADMISSION/I.R. and IA No.167663/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF
THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.167664/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)
Date : 04-01-2022 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA
For Petitioner(s)
Mr. Manoj K. Mishra, Adv.
Mr. Umesh Dubey, Adv.
Mr. Prateek Som, Adv.
Mr. Sudhir S. Rawat, Adv.
Ms. Renuka, Adv.
Mr. Vishrov Mukerjee, Adv.
For Respondent(s)
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
Considering the fact that there is no documentary evidence to
show that the deceased was getting Rs.4,500/- p.m. and Rs.3,000/-
additionally towards food allowances, the High Court has rightly
not accepted the same in the absence of any proof. The High Court
has rightly considered the income/wages as salary at Rs.4,000/-
p.m. We are in complete agreement with the view taken by the High
Court. The Special Leave Petitions stand dismissed.
Pending applications stand disposed of.
(R. NATARAJAN) (VIRENDER SINGH)
ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS BRANCH OFFICER
Digitally signed by R
Natarajan
Date: 2022.01.07
15:23:21 IST
Reason:
Signature Not Verified