Advocates:
ANIL KUMAR

WP(Crl) 524/2021

1

ITEM NO.10

Court 4 (Video Conferencing) SECTION PIL-W

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Writ Petition (Criminal) No.524/2021

SARDAR CHARANJEET SINGH CHANDERPAL Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)

(With appln.(s) for IA No.162207/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

and IA No.162812/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT and IA

No.162810/2021-INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT )

Date : 21-01-2022 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE BELA M. TRIVEDI

For Petitioner(s)

Mr. S. Charanjeet Chanderpal, Petitioner-in-prson

Mr. Anil Kumar, AOR

For Respondent(s)

Mr. Sanjay Kapur, AOR

Ms. Megha Karnwal, Adv.

Mrs. Shubhra Kapur, Adv.

Mr. Lalit Rajput, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

1

Invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 32 of the Constitution, Mr

Charanjeet Singh Chanderpal, a member of the Bar, who appears in-person,

has sought the following reliefs:

Digitally signed by

Rajni Mukhi

Date: 2022.01.22

11:58:34 IST

Reason:

Signature Not Verified

WP(Crl) 524/2021

2

“(a)

That the Ministry of Home along with the Ministry of

Information Technology and Telecom regulatory authority

of India along with the Respective State Police Authorities

of different states may be directed to take action ( as

ministry of Home of Union as well as State deals with

police, law and order which falls in the concurrent list if

the Constitution of India) to take Preventive action on

social media against Kangana Rangaut i.e Respondent No.

17 and none of her post on social media should be allowed

without amendment, deletion, modification or censoring

in-order to maintain law and order in the Country. Such

other preventive measures as may be deemed fit may

also be taken.

(b)

That, in terms of the recent comments made by Kangna

Ranaut, Respondent no. 17 as regards the Farmer’s Laws

vis a vis its irrelevant reference as a Khalistani Arm

twisting tactic, referred to in Annexure P/ 1 , all complaints

received and FIRs registered all over India, in line with

judgment of this court in T. T. Anthony vs State of Kerala

2001 (6) SCC may be sent to the Khar Police Station at

Mumbai and may be investigated in or with FIR 725 of

2021 with Khar Police Station which shall file the

chargesheet in a period of 6 months and the Trial Court

may complete the trial expeditiously within a period of 2

years.”

2

As regards the first of the above reliefs, the petitioner in-person states that

he has already adopted proceedings for the purpose of availing of his

remedies in accordance with law by instituting a private complaint. In view of

the invocation of the remedy by the petitioner in-person, he requests this

Court to dispose of the petition, insofar as prayer (a) is concerned without

the expression of any opinion by this Court.

3

Mr Charanjeet Singh Chanderpal, the petitioner in-person states that prayer

(b) is not pressed.

4

For the above reasons, we are not inclined to entertain the Petition under

Article 32 of the Constitution any further and dispose of the Petition.

WP(Crl) 524/2021

3

5

Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.

(CHETAN KUMAR)

(SAROJ KUMARI GAUR)

A.R.-cum-P.S.

COURT MASTER