NANDLAL – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent
ITEM NO.75 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION II-A
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR RAJESH KUMAR GOEL
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) Diary No(s). 29728/2018
NANDLAL Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Respondent(s)
Date : 29-11-2018 This petition was called on for hearing today.
For Petitioner(s)
Mr. Dinesh Chandra Pandey, AOR
Mr. Rajeev Gurung,Adv.
For Respondent(s)
Mr. Anoop Kandari,Adv.
Mr. Nishant R. Katneshwarkar,Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
Service of notice is complete qua sole respondent but no one
has entered appearance on his behalf.
However, Mr. Anoop Kandari, Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf
of Mr. Nishant R. Katneshwarkar, Ld. Advocate-on-Record seeks and
is given two weeks’ time to file the vakalatnama and four weeks’
time to file counter affidavit on behalf of sole respondent. After
expiry of four weeks’ the matter be proces
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.