SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

BHARAT DAS VAISHNAV – Appellant
Versus
SERIOUS FRAUD INVESTIGATION OFFICE – Respondent


Advocates:
NIKHIL JAIN

ITEM NO.11 COURT NO.12 SECTION II-B

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Miscellaneous Application No.1772/2022 in SLP(Crl) No.4102/2022

BHARAT DAS VAISHNAV Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

SERIOUS FRAUD INVESTIGATION OFFICE Respondent(s)

(FOR ADMISSION and IA No.144165/2022-CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION

IA No.144165/2022 - CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION)

Date : 01-11-2022 This MA was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.B. PARDIWALA

For Petitioner(s)

Mr. Rishi Sehgal, Adv.

Mr. Nikhil Jain, AOR

Mr. Hargun Sandhu, Adv.

Mr. Prabhneer Swani, Adv.

Mr. Arveen Sekhon, Adv.

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

1.

At the commencement of hearing, learned counsel appearing

on behalf of the petitioner submits that as the High Court has

reserved the order in the proceedings before it, MA No. 1772/2022

has become infructuous and the sa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top