SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

TEJPAL – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


Advocates:
JAY KISHOR SINGH

ITEM NO.40 COURT NO.3 SECTION IV-B

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).7512/2022

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 16-09-2021

in CWP No.3804/2021 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At

Chandigarh)

TEJPAL Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

THE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s)

(FOR ADMISSION and I.R.)

Date : 13-05-2022 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.B. PARDIWALA

For Petitioner(s)

Mr. Jay Kishor Singh, AOR

Mr. Mohit Raj, Adv.

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

We decline to interfere in this special leave

petition, as we find that the High Court has recorded finding

of fact that possession of the subject land had already been

taken on 16.07.2007.

In that view of the matter, the relief of lapsing of

acquisition proceeding

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top