IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. /2023 (@ CIVIL APPEAL Diary No(s). 31182/2023)

ARN INFRASTRUCTURE INDIA LIMITED APPELLANT(S)

VERSUS HARA PRASAD GHOSH RESPONDENT(S)

O R D E R

Issue notice on the application seeking condonation of delay as well as in the appeals.

There is delay of 249 days in filing this appeal.

Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that since the company was struck off and thereafterwards has been restored, hence, the delay.

Learned counsel for the respondent vehemently objected to any condonation of delay.

However, for the reasons stated by the appellant we find sufficient cause has been made out to condone the delay. Hence, application seeking condonation of delay is allowed.

Though these appeals are listed for admission, with the consent of learned counsel on both sides, these appeals are heard finally.

The appellant (opposite party) is aggrieved by the impugned order dated 27.10.2022 by which the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the “NCDRC” for the sake of convenience) in Complaint Case No.1456/2019 Signature Not Verified Digitarlly seignfed buysed to grant time to the