SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
VINAY YADAV – Appellant
Versus
ANITA JINDAL – Respondent
C.A. No.-007600 / 2022
21-11-2022
AMAN MOHIT HINGORANI
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO.7600 OF 2022
VINAY YADAV APPELLANT
VERSUS
ANITA JINDAL & ANR.
RESPONDENTS
O R D E R
Having heard learned senior counsel for the
appellant and having perused the material placed on
record as also having gone through the cited decisions in
E.S. Krishnamurthy and Ors. v. Bharath Hi-Tecch Builders
Private Limited: (2022) 3 SCC 161 and Innoventive
Industries Limited v. ICICI Bank and Anr.: (2018) 1 SCC
407, which have been duly taken into consideration by the
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, we are satisfied
that the view as taken by the Appellate Tribunal,
particularly with reference to the factual matrix of the
present case, is a just and proper view of the matter,
more particularly with reference to the latest view of
this Court as reflected in Vidarbha Industries Power
Limited v. Axis Bank Limited: (2022) 8 SCC 352.
1
Digitally signed by
ARJUN BISHT
Date: 2022.11.22
16:04:59 IST
Reason:
Signature Not Verified
No case for interference being made out, this
appeal stands dismissed.
Pending application also stands disposed of.
...................J.
(DINESH MAHESHWARI)
...................J.
(SUDHANSHU DHULIA)
New Delhi;
November 21, 2022
2
ITEM NO.15 COURT NO.7 SECTION XVII
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Civil Appeal No(s).7600/2022
VINAY YADAV Appellant(s)
VERSUS
ANITA JINDAL & ANR. Respondent(s)
(FOR ADMISSION and IA No.158067/2022-EX-PARTE STAY)
Date : 21-11-2022 This appeal was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSHU DHULIA
For Appellant(s)
Mr. Neeraj Kishan Kaul, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Toshiv Goyal, Adv.
Mr. Dhruv Sharma, Adv.
Mr. Chirag Pathor, Adv.
Mr. Aman Mohit Hingorani, AOR
For Respondent(s)
Mr. B. K. Satija, AOR
Mr. Himanshu Satija, Adv.
Ms. Neha Mehta, Adv.
Mr. Harshit K., Adv.
Ms. Aditi Gupta, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
The appeal is dismissed in terms of the signed order.
Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of.
(ARJUN BISHT) (RANJANA SHAILEY)
COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)
(signed order is placed on the file)
3