SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
VINAY YADAV – Appellant
Versus
ANITA JINDAL – Respondent
C.A. No.-007600 / 2022 21-11-2022



Advocates:
AMAN MOHIT HINGORANI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL NO.7600 OF 2022

VINAY YADAV APPELLANT

VERSUS

ANITA JINDAL & ANR.

RESPONDENTS

O R D E R

Having heard learned senior counsel for the

appellant and having perused the material placed on

record as also having gone through the cited decisions in

E.S. Krishnamurthy and Ors. v. Bharath Hi-Tecch Builders

Private Limited: (2022) 3 SCC 161 and Innoventive

Industries Limited v. ICICI Bank and Anr.: (2018) 1 SCC

407, which have been duly taken into consideration by the

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, we are satisfied

that the view as taken by the Appellate Tribunal,

particularly with reference to the factual matrix of the

present case, is a just and proper view of the matter,

more particularly with reference to the latest view of

this Court as reflected in Vidarbha Industries Power

Limited v. Axis Bank Limited: (2022) 8 SCC 352.

1

Digitally signed by

ARJUN BISHT

Date: 2022.11.22

16:04:59 IST

Reason:

Signature Not Verified

No case for interference being made out, this

appeal stands dismissed.

Pending application also stands disposed of.

...................J.

(DINESH MAHESHWARI)

...................J.

(SUDHANSHU DHULIA)

New Delhi;

November 21, 2022

2

ITEM NO.15 COURT NO.7 SECTION XVII

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Civil Appeal No(s).7600/2022

VINAY YADAV Appellant(s)

VERSUS

ANITA JINDAL & ANR. Respondent(s)

(FOR ADMISSION and IA No.158067/2022-EX-PARTE STAY)

Date : 21-11-2022 This appeal was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSHU DHULIA

For Appellant(s)

Mr. Neeraj Kishan Kaul, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Toshiv Goyal, Adv.

Mr. Dhruv Sharma, Adv.

Mr. Chirag Pathor, Adv.

Mr. Aman Mohit Hingorani, AOR

For Respondent(s)

Mr. B. K. Satija, AOR

Mr. Himanshu Satija, Adv.

Ms. Neha Mehta, Adv.

Mr. Harshit K., Adv.

Ms. Aditi Gupta, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

The appeal is dismissed in terms of the signed order.

Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of.

(ARJUN BISHT) (RANJANA SHAILEY)

COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)

(signed order is placed on the file)

3

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top