SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

R.M. LODHA,MADAN B. LOKUR,KURIAN JOSEPH
MANOHAR LAL SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates:

Page 1

JUDGMENT

1

REPORTABLE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

WRIT PETITION (C) NO. 417 OF 2012

MANOHAR LAL SHARMA

... PETITIONER(s)

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

... RESPONDENT(s)

O R D E R

We have heard Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma –

petitioner in person and Mr. Goolam E. Vahanvati,

learned Attorney General. We have also heard Mr.

Vikramjit Banerjee, learned counsel for the intervenor

– Swadeshi Jagaran Foundation in I.A. No. 2 of 2012.

2.

Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma – petitioner in person

prays for withdrawal of the rejoinder-affidavit in its

entirety in view of the objectionable statements

contained therein.

We allow him to do so. It is

directed that no part of the rejoinder-affidavit shall

be treated as part of the record.

3.

In the Writ Petition, the petitioner has prayed

Page 2

JUDGMENT

2

for quashing Press Note Nos. 4,5,6,7 and 8 of (2012

Series) dated 20th September, 2012 being unconstitutional

and without any authority of law.

4.

By these Press Notes, the policy of Foreign

Direct Investment (FDI) in Single-Brand Product Retail

T

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top