SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

VINEETA SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
RAKESH SHARMA – Respondent


Advocates:
RASHMI NANDAKUMAR

1

ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.3 SECTION XIV

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

CIVIL APPEAL Diary No(s). 32601/2018

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 15-05-2018

in RFA No. 301/2017 passed by the High Court of Delhi At New Delhi)

VINEETA SHARMA Appellant(s)

VERSUS

RAKESH SHARMA Respondent(s)

(IA No.139136/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING CIVIL APPEAL)

Date : 05-12-2018 This appeal was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER

For Petitioner(s)

Mr. Biswajit Bhattacharya, Sr. Adv.

Ms. Rashmi Nandakumar, AOR

Mr. Shankar Narayanan, Adv.

For Respondent(s) Mr. Subhasish Mohanty, AOR

Ms. Jyoti Prakash Mohanty, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

There is a conflict of opinion in two Division Bench Judgments

of this Court i.e. Prakash vs. Phulav

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top