SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA,V. GOPALA GOWDA
ANIL GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
STAR INDIA PVT.LTD. – Respondent


Advocates:
ASHOK MATHURMANIK KARANJAWALA

Page 1

JUDGMENT

1

REPORTABLE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1364 OF 2014

(arising out of SLP(Crl.) No.7039 of 2007)

Anil Gupta

… APPELLANT

VERSUS

Star India Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.

… RESPONDENTS

J U D G M E N T

SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA,J.

Leave granted.

2.

This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 13th

August, 2007 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in

Criminal Miscellaneous Case No.2380 of 2004. By the impugned

judgment, the High Court held that the complaint under Section 138

read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881

(hereinafter referred to as the, ‘Act’) was barred by limitation

and quashed the summon order against respondent no.2-Visionaries

Media Network (hereinafter referred to as the, ‘Company’). It

further held that the dispute qua the appellant (petitioner no.2

before High Court) is within limitation and affirmed the summon

order against the appellant.

3.

The factual matrix of the case is as follows:

Page 2

JUDGMENT

2

A subscription agreement was entered into between respondent

nos.1 and 2 whereby respondent no.2-Company was

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top