SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

UMA RANI – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates:
BALAJI SRINIVASAN

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL NO. OF 2019

(D.NO. 32985/2018)

UMA RANI Appellant(s)

VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)

O R D E R

Application seeking leave to appeal is allowed.

Delay condoned.

Heard the learned Counsel for the appellant.

We do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned

orders passed by the Armed Forces Tribunal, Regional Bench,

Chennai.

Accordingly, the appeals are dismissed.

Pending applications stand disposed of.

.......................... J.

(ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN)

.......................... J.

(VINEET SARAN)

New Delhi;

January 18, 2019.

Digitally signed by R

NATARAJAN

Date: 2019.02.22

16:14:29 IST

Reason:

Signature Not Verified

REVISED

ITEM NO.4 COURT NO.5 SECTION XVII

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

CIVIL APPEAL Diary No(s). 32985/2018

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 31-03-2017

in RA No. 15/2015 31-03-2017 in MA No. 285/2015 03-09-2015

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top