SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
UMA RANI – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
C.A. No.-001540-001541 / 2019 18-01-2019



Advocates:
BALAJI SRINIVASAN

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL NO. OF 2019

(D.NO. 32985/2018)

UMA RANI Appellant(s)

VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)

O R D E R

Application seeking leave to appeal is allowed.

Delay condoned.

Heard the learned Counsel for the appellant.

We do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned

orders passed by the Armed Forces Tribunal, Regional Bench,

Chennai.

Accordingly, the appeals are dismissed.

Pending applications stand disposed of.

.......................... J.

(ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN)

.......................... J.

(VINEET SARAN)

New Delhi;

January 18, 2019.

Digitally signed by R

NATARAJAN

Date: 2019.02.22

16:14:29 IST

Reason:

Signature Not Verified

REVISED

ITEM NO.4 COURT NO.5 SECTION XVII

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

CIVIL APPEAL Diary No(s). 32985/2018

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 31-03-2017

in RA No. 15/2015 31-03-2017 in MA No. 285/2015 03-09-2015 in MA

No. 169/2015 08-06-2015 in OA No. 19/2014 passed by the Armed

Forces Tribunal)

UMA RANI Appellant(s)

VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)

(IA No.4761/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA

No.4764/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and

IA No.4763/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.4758/2019-

CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING and IA No.4760/2019-LEAVE TO

APPEAL U/S 31(1) OF THE ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL ACT, 2007)

Date : 18-01-2019 These matters were called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN

For Petitioner(s)

Ms. Garima Jain, Adv.

Mr. Balaji Srinivasan, AOR

Mr. Siddhanth Kohli, Adv.

Ms. Pallavi Sengupta, Adv.

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

The appeals are dismissed in terms of the signed order.

(R. NATARAJAN) (TAPAN KUMAR CHAKRABORTY)

COURT MASTER (SH) ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

(Corrected order is placed on the file)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL NO. OF 2018

(D.NO. 32985/2018)

UMA RANI Appellant(s)

VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)

O R D E R

Application seeking leave to appeal is allowed.

Delay condoned.

Heard the learned Counsel for the appellant.

We do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned

orders passed by the Armed Forces Tribunal, Regional Bench,

Chennai.

Accordingly, the appeals are dismissed.

Pending applications stand disposed of.

.......................... J.

(ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN)

.......................... J.

(VINEET SARAN)

New Delhi;

January 18, 2019.

ITEM NO.4 COURT NO.5 SECTION XVII

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

CIVIL APPEAL Diary No(s). 32985/2018

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 31-03-2017

in RA No. 15/2015 31-03-2017 in MA No. 285/2015 03-09-2015 in MA

No. 169/2015 08-06-2015 in OA No. 19/2014 passed by the Armed

Forces Tribunal)

UMA RANI Appellant(s)

VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)

(IA No.4761/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA

No.4764/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and

IA No.4763/2019-EXEMPTION FROM

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top