SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
SHRIRAM RAMKISAN VERMA – Appellant
Versus
SANJAY GUNWANTRAO BAND – Respondent
SLP(Crl) No.-001336-001337 / 2019
18-11-2022
ANAGHA S. DESAI
ITEM NO.33 COURT NO.5 SECTION II-A
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) Nos.1336-1337/2019
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 26-03-2018
in CRLAP No. 855/2016, 26-03-2018 in CRLAP No. 721/2017 passed by
the High Court of Judicature at Bombay at Nagpur)
SHRIRAM RAMKISAN VERMA Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
SANJAY GUNWANTRAO BAND & ORS. Respondent(s)
Date : 18-11-2022 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH
For Petitioner(s)
Mr. Satyajit A. Desai, Adv.
Mr. Sachin Patil, Adv.
Mr. Satya Kam Sharma, Adv.
Mr. Abhinav K. Mutyalwar, Adv.
Mr. Gajanan Tirthkar, Adv.
Mr. Siddharth Gautam, Adv.
Ms. Anagha S. Desai, AOR
For Respondent(s)
Mr. Sudheer Voditel, Adv.
Mr. Ravindra Bana, AOR
Mr. Ravi Srivastava, Adv.
Mr. Gagan Sanghi, Adv.
Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, AOR
Mr. Anand Dilip Landge, Adv.
Mr. Siddharth Dharmadhikari, Adv.
Mr. Aaditya A. Pande, AOR
Mr. Avineesh Jha, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
Having heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
respective parties and having gone through the allegations in the
complaint and in absence of any specific allegation that right from
very beginning, it was the intention of the respondents to deceive
the complainant and there was a dishonest intention on the part of
contd..
Digitally signed by
Neetu Sachdeva
Date: 2022.11.19
12:48:28 IST
Reason:
Signature Not Verified
- 2 -
the accused from the very beginning and that the complainant relied
upon the assurances given, the High Court has rightly quashed the
criminal proceedings in exercise of powers under Section 482 of the
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
At this stage, it is required to be noted and it is not in
dispute that even the complainant has already filed a substantive
suit for specific performance before the competent Civil Court. In
that view of the matter, no interference of this Court is called
for. The Special Leave Petitions stand dismissed.
Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
(NEETU SACHDEVA) (NISHA TRIPATHI)
ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR