SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

AMRIK SINGH – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent


Advocates:
SHREE PAL SINGHJASPREET GOGIA

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.993 OF 2012 Amrik Singh ...Appellant Versus The State of Punjab ...Respondent With CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.992 OF 2012 Subhash Chander …Appellant Versus The State of Punjab …Respondent

J U D G M E N T

M. R. Shah, J.

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned Signature Not Verifiejdudgment and order dated 01.04.2011 passed by the High Digitally signed by R Natarajan Date: 2022.07.11 Reason: Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in Criminal Appeal No.645 of 2004 and Criminal Appeal No.563 of 2004 by which the Division Bench of the High Court has dismissed the said appeals preferred by the accused and has confirmed the conviction and sentence passed by the learned Trial Court convicting the accused Amrik Singh and Subhash Chander for the offences punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 and Section 392 of the IPC, the accused Amrik Singh and Subhash Chander have preferred the present appeals.

2. That the appellant herein was charged along with one Subhash Chander and Pritpal Singh for committing robbery and murdering one Gian Chand (deceased) during the course of the robbery. A

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top