SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

UTTAM – Appellant
Versus
SAUBHAG SINGH – Respondent


Advocates:
PRATIBHA JAIN

ITEM NO.50 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IVA

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 6036/2014

UTTAM Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

SAUBHAG SINGH & ORS Respondent(s)

(with appln. (s) for permission to file additional documents)

Date : 25/03/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today.

For Petitioner(s)

Ms. Veena Rattan, Adv.

Ms. Pratibha Jain,Adv.

For Respondent(s)

Mr. Niraj Sharma,Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

Respondent Nos.1 and 2 have filed the counter affidavit.

However, respondent No.3 has failed to file the same, despite

last opportunity given for the purpose. Time stipulated has

also expired. Further opportunity is, therefore, declined.

Service of respondent No.4 is not yet effected. The Ld.

Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps to effect the

same.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top