SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

RAJ KUMAR SHIVHARE – Appellant
Versus
ASST.DIR.DIRECTORATE OF ENFORT. – Respondent


Advocates:
DHARMENDRA KUMAR SINHAB. KRISHNA PRASAD

REPORTABLE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL NO.3221 OF 2010

(Arising out of SLP (Civil) No.28877 of 2008)

Raj Kumar Shivhare

..Appellant(s)

Versus

Assistant Director, Directorate of

Enforcement & Another

..Respondent(s)

J U D G M E N T

GANGULY, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. This appeal arises out of the Division Bench

judgment of the High Court of Delhi in WP No.

6527/2008 filed by the appellant-Rajkumar Shivhare.

3. A Writ Petition was filed challenging the order

dated 17.7.2008 of the Appellate Tribunal for

Foreign Exchange, Janpath, New Delhi, (hereinafter

‘the Tribunal’), on various grounds with which this

1

Court is not concerned. By that order, the

Tribunal refused to dispense with the pre-deposit

of penalty by the appellant and the concluding

portion of that order is:

“…Therefore,

the

application

for

dispensation of pre-deposit of penalty is

dismissed and rejected but the appellant

is permitted to deposit full amount of

penalty within thirty days from the date

of receipt of the order failing which the

appeal will be dismissed on this ground

alone. The app

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top