SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

V. N. PATIL – Appellant
Versus
K. NIRANJAN KUMAR – Respondent


Advocates:
RAJESH MAHALE

ITEM NO.96 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION II-C

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR ANIL LAXMAN PANSARE

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 8965/2018

V. N. PATIL Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

K. NIRANJAN KUMAR Respondent(s)

Date : 29-11-2018 This petition was called on for hearing today.

For Petitioner(s)

Mr. Shanth Kumar V Mahale, Adv.

Mr. Abdul Rahiman, Adv.

Mr. Rajesh Mahale, AOR

For Respondent(s)

Mr. Joseph Aristotle S., AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

Service is complete on respondent No.1. The Ld.

Advocate-on-record, Mr. Durga Dutt appears for respondent No.1.

He seeks time to file vakalatnama and counter affidavit. Be

filed within four weeks.

Service is complete on respondent Nos.2 and 3. The Ld.

Advocate, Mr.Abhishek Raj, appearing on behalf of Ms.Sunita

Sharma, Advocate-on-record appears for respondent Nos.2 a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top