SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SUKHBIRI DEVI – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates:
LAXMI ARVINDAJAY SHARMA

ITEM NO.14 COURT NO.15 SECTION XIV

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

I.A. 4/2016, I.A. 5/2016 in Civil Appeal No(s). 10834/2010

SUKHBIRI DEVI & ORS. Appellant(s)

VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)

(For substitution of deceased petitioner and c/delay in filing

substitution application)

Date : 26/09/2016 These applications were called on for hearing

today.

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT

[IN CHAMBERS]

For Appellant(s)

Ms. Poonam Prasad, Adv.

For Ms. Laxmi Arvind, AOR

For Respondent(s)

Mr. A. Deb Kumar, Adv.

For Mrs. Anil Katiyar, AOR

Mr. Ajay Sharma, AOR

Ms. Binu Tamta, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

Delay in filing the application for substitution is condoned.

Abatement, if any, is set aside.

Application for substitution to bring on record the Lrs of

deceased Appellant No.3 - Raj Singh is allowed. The Lrs mentioned

in paragra

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top