SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

BASALINGAPPA – Appellant
Versus
MUDIBASAPPA – Respondent


Advocates:
S. N. BHAT

Judgement Key Points

The legal point held in this case is that the court issued a direction to the petitioner to deposit the amount in question in the trial court within six weeks. Upon depositing the amount, there was a stay of recovery granted, and the deposited amount was to be kept in fixed deposit by the trial court (!) (!) (!) .


ITEM NO.26 COURT NO.4 SECTION II-C

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 8641/2018

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04-07-2018

in CRLA No. 200042/2015 passed by the High Court Of Karnataka At

Kalaburagi)

BASALINGAPPA Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

MUDIBASAPPA Respondent(s)

(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. )

Date : 26-10-2018 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN

For Petitioner(s) Mr. S. N. Bhat, AOR

Mr. Priyank Jain, Adv.

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

Issue notice, returnable in six weeks.

On depositing the amount in question in the Trial Court within

six weeks from today there shall be stay of recovery. The amount

so deposited shall be kept in Fixed Deposit by the Trial Court.

(ASHWANI THAKUR) (RAJIN

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top