SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

JAGDISH MANDAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ORISSA . – Respondent


Advocates:
NIKILESH RAMACHANDRANSATYA MITRA GARG

http://JUDIS.NIC.IN

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Page 1 of 12

CASE NO.:

Appeal (civil) 5699 of 2006

PETITIONER:

Jagdish Mandal

RESPONDENT:

State of Orissa & Ors.

DATE OF JUDGMENT: 20/\020K/06

BENCH:

G. P. Mathur & R. V. Raveendran

JUDGMENT:

J U D G M E N T

[Arising out of SLP (Civil) No.3196/2006]

With

CIVIL APPEAL NO.5700/2006

[Arising out of SLP (Civil) No.7817/2006]

Laxman Sharma \005. Appellant

Vs.

State of Orissa & Others \005. Respondents

R.V. RAVEENDRAN, J.

Leave granted in both the special leave petitions.

These two appeals by special leave, arise out of a common judgment

dated 25.1.2006 passed by the Orissa High Court allowing Writ Petition

(Civil) Nos. 4769/2005 and 4768/2005 filed by Narayan Mohanty (common

fifth respondent in these two appeals). In the said petitions, Narayan

Mohanty had challenged the award of construction contracts to Jagdish

Mandal and Laxman Sharma (respective appellant in these appeals) in Upper

Indravati Irrigation Project (’UIIP’ for short). The State, the Executive

Engineer (Right Canal Division No.III), the Chief Engineer (UII

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top