SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

G.S. SINGHVI,SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA
RASHMI AJAY KR.KESHARWANI – Appellant
Versus
AJAY KR.KESHARWANI – Respondent


Advocates:
SHOMILA BAKSHIPRADEEP MISRA

Page 1

JUDGMENT

REPORTABLE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL

 

   APPEAL

 

   NO.518

 

   OF

    2012

 

 

(ARISING OUT OF SLP(CRL.) NO.9113 OF 2011)

RASHMI AJAY KR. KESHARWANI & ANR.

    … APPELLANTS

VERUS

AJAY KR. KESHARWANI AND ORS.            … RESPONDENTS

O   R   D   E   R 

Leave granted.

2.

Ist 

appellant­Rashmi 

is 

the 

wife 

and 

2nd 

appellant­  Aryan  is  the  son  of  the  Ist  respondent­

Ajay Kumar. The Ist appellant and the Ist respondent 

were  married  on  20th  April,  2001  as  per  Hindu  rites 

and out of their wedlock the 2nd appellant­Aryan was 

born on 4th November, 2003.

In 

the 

present 

case 

the 

appellants 

have 

challenged  the  order  dated  9th  November,  2011  passed 

by the Allahabad High Court in the Habeas Corpus Writ 

Petition  No.36326  of  2011,  whereby  the  High  Court 

issued 

non­bailable 

warrant 

against 

the 

Ist 

1

Page 2

JUDGMENT

appellant  to  ensure  her  presence  and  the  production 

of the 2nd appellant. 

3.

According  to  the  Ist  appellant,  since  her 

marriage, she was constantly subjected to mental and 

physical  torture  by  the  Ist  respondent  and  her  in­

laws for bringing 

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top