SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
STATE BANK OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
SACHIV AGRA VANIJIYIK BANK KARAMCHARI (VETAN BHOGI) SAHKARI RIN EVAM SAKH SAMITI LIMITED – Respondent
C.A. No.-000071-000071 / 2012
26-07-2022
ANIL KUMAR SANGALMONA K. RAJVANSHI
1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO.71 OF 2012
STATE BANK OF INDIA & ANR. APPELLANT(S)
VERSUS
SACHIV AGRA VANIJIYIK BANK
KARAMCHARI (VETAN BHOGI) SAHKARI RIN
EVAM SAKH SAMITI LIMITED & ORS.
RESPONDENT(S)
O R D E R
1.
The 2nd respondent was an employee of the appellant Bank. He
availed a loan from the 1st respondent-Cooperative Society. He
entered into an agreement with the appellant Bank. It is the case
of the appellant Bank that in terms of the agreement, the appellant
Bank was obliged to deduct amounts due towards the loan taken by
the 2nd respondent from the salary. A Voluntary Retirement Scheme
(for short 'VRS') was introduced in the Bank. The 2nd respondent
sought to avail the benefit of the Scheme. The appellant Bank
accepted the application filed by the 2nd respondent for voluntary
retirement. Consequently, the appellant bank paid the entire
benefits payable under the Voluntary Retirement Scheme to the 2nd
respondent. The 1st respondent-Cooperative Society approached the
Registrar under Section 40(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Cooperative
Societies Act, 1965. The said Authority after notice to the
Digitally signed by
JAGDISH KUMAR
Date: 2022.08.04
17:16:28 IST
Reason:
Signature Not Verified
2
appellant allowed the application filed by the 1st respondent-
Cooperative Society in the following terms.:-
"Therefore, the employer/State Bank of India,
S.S.I. Branch Industrial Estate Nunihai Agra is
liable to pay to the Society for knowingly not
deducting the outstanding due loan amount of the
Society from the retiral benefits of Shri Ashok
Kumar the member of Agra Commercial bank employee
(in pay) Cooperative loan and credit Society Ltd.
6/6/2, Shastrinagar Khandari Agra under sub section
3 of Section 40 of U.P. Cooperative Society Act,
1965. It is clear from the circulars of the employer
that the office authorized for the purpose of
deductions is the Branch Manager. Therefore, it is
in accordance with the rules to make recovery of the
said amount of Rs.2,04,065/- (Rupees Two Lakh Four
Thousand Sixty Five) from Shri Kanhaiya Lal Agarwal
Branch Manager, State Bank of India S.S.I. Branch
Industrial Estate Nunihai Agra."
2.
Aggrieved by the said order, the appellant Bank filed the writ
petition challenging the same before the High Court. The High Court
by the impugned order found, inter alia, as follows:-
"We have considered the submissions made by learned
counsel for the parties and have gone through the
orders passed by the Joint Registrar, Cooperative
Societies, Agra Region, Agra. The bank has admitted
that it was statutorily liable to deduct unpaid loan
from the salary of the employee. The bank had also
assured the repayment under the agreement. The
cooperative society did not take any collateral
security from the employee as repayment of the loan
was assured by the bank. The defence taken by the bank
that the management was not aware of the unpaid loan
proves the negligence of both the management as well
as the then Branch Manager of the bank. A surety is
not permitted to plead ignorance of the contract. The
amount of ex-gratia should not have been paid to Shri
Ashok Kumar, the employee and in any case, when the
3
account was still operative, the then bank manager was
responsible to honour the cheque. We find that apart
from the agreement by which the payment of the loan
was assured by making deductions from the salary of
the employee, sub-section (3) of Section 40 of the
Cooperative Societies Act, 1965 is attracted and that
the bank did not establish sufficient cause to make
deductions in terms of sub-section (2) of Section 40
of the Act.
We, however, find that Shri Kanhaiya Lal Agrawal was
not posted in the branch at the relevant time and that
he had offered sufficient explan