SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
AFTAB ALAM,RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI
RAM DEO PRASAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF BIHAR – Respondent
Crl.A. No.-001354-001354 / 2012 11-04-2013



Advocates:
MRIDULA RAY BHARADWAJGOPAL SINGH

Page 1

JUDGMENT

REPORTABLE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1354 OF 2012

RAM DEO PRASAD

… APPELLANT

VERSUS

STATE OF BIHAR

… RESPONDENT

J U D G M E N T

Aftab Alam,J.

1.

The appellant Ram Deo Prasad has been awarded death penalty for

raping and inflicting injuries to a four year old child causing her death.

2.

The prosecution case is based on the statement of one Mohd.

Kamruddin Mian made before Sub-Inspector, Birendra Kumar Pandey of

Siwan Town P.S. on December 21, 2004 at 8:15 a.m. at the Sadar Hospital,

Siwan. Mohd. Kamruddin stated that on the previous night after finishing

their meal at about 8:30 p.m. his family had gone to sleep at his house in

village Badka Gaon, P.S. Pachrukhi District Siwan. His four year old

1

Page 2

JUDGMENT

daughter Laila Khatoon was sleeping by the side of her grandmother on the

outer verandah of the house and on the other side of the straw bed, the girl’s

mother was sleeping with her infant child. In the middle of the night, the

Informant who was sleeping in an inside room came out to relieve himself

and found Laila Khatoon missing from the side of her grandmother. A search

started for the girl and then his neighbour, Suman Kumar Sah (PW.2) told

them that just a little while ago he had seen the appellant swiftly running

away towards east, carrying a girl child in his arms who was crying. As

informed by Suman Sah, he (the Informant) and the villagers assembled there

proceeded towards east in search (of the child). After going for about a

kilometer, they heard the sound of heavy foot-steps and on going in the

direction of the sound they saw that the appellant, who was fleeing away with

the child, flung the child in the wheat field (by the side of the pathway) and

ran away. On going to the child, he found that it was his missing daughter.

She was moaning and bleeding from her private parts. The informant further

stated that he fully believed that the appellant after committing rape on her

child was taking her away with the intent to kill her and to hide the body

somewhere.

2

Page 3

JUDGMENT

3.

The statement was reduced to writing, as the fard-e-beyan (Exhibit 4)

by Sub-Inspector, Birendra Kumar Pandey (PW.6) and was duly signed by

the Informant and a witness, apart from the Sub-Inspector recording it. It was

dispatched to Pachrukhi police station, within the jurisdiction of which the

offence was committed, and there the recorded statement was incorporated in

the formal FIR (Exhibit 1), registered as Pachrukhi P.S. case No.131/2004

dated December 21, 2004 under section 376 of the Penal Code.

4.

The child Laila Khatoon died at the Sadar Hospital Siwan on the same

day and consequently section 302 of the Penal Code was also added to the

case.

5.

On the following day (December 22, 2004) at 11:00 a.m. the

Investigating Officer of the case (PW.4) went to the collector’s office (in

Siwan town) for a meeting in connection with the preparations for the

elections that were to be held shortly. There he was told by the officer in-

charge of the Siwan Town P.S. that at 9.00 that morning the appellant was

caught at the Siwan bus-stand and he was detained at the Town P.S. The

Investigating Officer went to the Town P.S., prepared the arrest memo of the

3

Page 4

JUDGMENT

appellant and sent him for production before the Magistrate with the request

to take him in judicial custody. The appellant was, thus, produced before the

Magistrate on December 22, 2004 and as per the request of the Investigating

Officer, was remanded to judicial custody.

6.

It did not occur to the Investigating Officer to take the appellant on

remand for interrogations or getting him examined by a doctor or seizing his

clothes etc.

7.

In course of investigation, the Investigating Officer inspected two sites

as “the place of occurrence”; one, the verandah of the Informant’s house from

where the child was

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top