SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

T.S. THAKUR,R. BANUMATHI
EDMUND S LYNGDOH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MEGHALAYA – Respondent


Advocates:
RISHI MALHOTRA

Page 1

JUDGMENT

REPORTABLE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2056 OF 2014

(Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 553/2011)

EDMUND S LYNGDOH

…Appellant

Versus

STATE OF MEGHALAYA

…Respondent

With

CRIMINAL APPEAL NOs. 2057-58 OF 2014

(Arising out of SLP (Crl.) Nos. 2203-2204/2011)

DEVA PRASAD SHARMA

…Appellant

Versus

CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

...Respondent

J U D G M E N T

R. BANUMATHI, J.

Leave granted.

2.

These appeals arising out of SLP (Crl.)

Nos. 2203-2204/2011 are filed challenging the judgment of

Page 2

JUDGMENT

the Gauhati High Court confirming the conviction of the

appellant-first accused (Deva Prasad Sharma) under Section

420 IPC, 120B IPC and Section 5(2) of Prevention of

Corruption Act, 1947 (for short ‘the P.C. Act’) and

enhancement of the sentence imposed on him. Fourth

accused (Edmund S. Lyngdoh) has preferred SLP (Crl.)

No.553/2011 challenging the reversal of his acquittal and

assailing the conviction under Section 420 IPC read with

Section 120B IPC.

3.

Deva Prasad Sharma (A-1) died on 9.10.2011

during the penden

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top