SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

STATE OF KARNATAKA – Appellant
Versus
C. LALITHA – Respondent


Advocates:
E. C. VIDYA SAGAR

http://JUDIS.NIC.IN

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Page 1 of 7

CASE NO.:

Appeal (civil) 919 of 2002

PETITIONER:

State of Karnataka & Ors.

RESPONDENT:

C. Lalitha

DATE OF JUDGMENT: 31/01/2006

BENCH:

S.B. Sinha & P.P. Naolekar

JUDGMENT:

JUDGMENT

S.B. SINHA, J.

Construction of an inter-parties order of this Court is in question in

this appeal wherein the validity of an amendment of the reservation policy of

the State which was the subject matter of a decision of this Court in N.T.

Devin Katti and Others v. Karnataka Public Service Commission and Others

[(1990) 3 SCC 157], had been raised. This Court therein declared that the

revised reservation policy was not applicable to selection initiated prior

thereto and consequently directed:

"15\005In this view, we direct the State Government

to appoint the appellants on the posts of Tehsildars

with retrospective effect, but if no vacancies are

available the State Government will create

supernumerary posts of Tehsildars for appointing

the appellants against those posts. We further

direct that for purposes of seniority the appellants

should be placed below last candidate appointed in

1976, but they will not be entitled to any

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top