SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
SOUTH EASTERN COALFIELDS LTD. . – Appellant
Versus
RASHTRIYA COLLIERY MAJDOOR CONGRESS – Respondent
C.A. No.-002907-002907 / 2014
30-09-2021
T. G. NARAYANAN NAIR
1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO.2907 OF 2014
SOUTH EASTERN COALFIELDS LTD. & ORS. APPELLANT(S)
VERSUS
RASHTRIYA COLLIERY MAJDOOR CONGRESS & ORS. RESPONDENT(S)
WITH
C.A. NO.6121 OF 2021
(@ SLP(C) No.2015/2011)
O R D E R
Leave granted in SLP(C) No.2015/2011.
The challenge in the present appeals is to an order passed by
the Division Bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court on 09.11.2010
whereby a circular dated 14.07.2007 was quashed and the appellants
were directed to extend the benefit of check-off facility to the
first respondent.
The question in the present appeal is whether a non-affiliated
Union to the 5 Central Trade Unions is entitled to seek check-off
facility i.e. whether deduction of the contribution of the
employees to the Trade Union by the employer is permissible under
Section 7(2)(kkk) of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936 (in short, ‘the
Act’). Section 7(2)(kkk) of the Act reads thus:
Digitally signed by R
Natarajan
Date: 2021.10.01
16:58:38 IST
Reason:
Signature Not Verified
2
“7. Deductions which may be made from wages.-
(1) ………………………
(2) Deductions from the wages of an employed person shall
be made only in accordance with the provisions of
this Act, and may be of the following kinds only,
namely-
(kkk) deductions made, with the written
authorisation of the employed person, for
payment of the fees payable by him for
the membership of any trade union
registered under the Trade Unions Act,
1926 (16 of 1926);
………….”
The requirements of the above provision is in two folds,
firstly, that the membership is of a registered Trade Union under
the Trade Unions Act, 1926 and secondly, there is a written
authorization of the employed person, for payment of the fees
payable by him for the membership of such a Trade Union. Therefore,
whether any Union is affiliated to the Central Unions or not, is
not contemplated by the Act.
Consequently, we do not find any error in the order passed by
the Division Bench of the High Court. It is clarified that if there
is a registered Trade Union and the person employed submits a
written authorization for the payment of membership fee, the same
is bound to be allowed by the appellants.
With the abovesaid directions and liberty, the appeals stand
disposed of.
3
In the light of the above, no orders are called for in
Interlocutory Application No.8 for impleadment.
Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
……………………………………………………J.
[HEMANT GUPTA]
……………………………………………………J.
[V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN]
NEW DELHI;
30th SEPTEMBER, 2021
4
ITEM NO.106 COURT NO.11 SECTION IV-C
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Civil Appeal No(s). 2907/2014
SOUTH EASTERN COALFIELDS LTD. & ORS. Appellant(s)
VERSUS
RASHTRIYA COLLIERY MAJDOOR CONGRESS & ORS. Respondent(s)
(I.A. No.8 (Application for impleadment) )
WITH
SLP(C) No. 2015/2011 (IV-C)
Date : 30-09-2021 These matters were called on for hearing today.
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN
For Appellant(s)/
Mr. Ajit Kumar Sinha, Sr. Adv.
Petitioner
Mr. T. G. Narayanan Nair, AOR
Ms. Priya Balakrishna, Adv.
Mr. Kunal Verma, AOR
Ms. Yugandhara Pawar Jha, Adv.
Mr. Ashwin Kumar Nair, Adv.
For respondent(s)
Mr. Colin Gonsalves Sr. Adv.
Mr. Amiy Shukla, Adv.
Mr. Sunil Singh Parihar, Adv.
Mr. Prashant Kumar, AOR
Mr. Amit Pawan, AOR
For applicant(s)
Mr. Upendra Pratap Singh, Adv.
Ms. Kheyali Singh, Adv.
Mr. Abhay Kumar, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
Leave granted in SLP(C) No.2015/2011