PEOPLE'S UNION FOR CIVIL LIBERTIES – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Page 1 of 7
CASE NO.:
Writ Petition (civil) 105 of 2004
PETITIONER:
People’s Union for Civil Liberties
RESPONDENT:
Union of India & Anr.
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 29/04/2005
BENCH:
S.B. Sinha, N. Santosh Hegde & B.P. Singh
JUDGMENT:
J U D G M E N T
SANTOSH HEGDE, J.
In this writ petition filed under Article 32 of the Constitution
of India, the petitioner is challenging a decision of the first
respondent Union of India appointing the respondent No.2 as a
member of the National Human Rights Commission (the
Commission). The primary basis of the challenge to his
appointment is on the ground that prior to the impugned
appointment the second respondent was holding the post of
Director, Central Bureau of Investigation and was also holding the
post of Vice-President (Asia) Interpol. According to the petitioner,
the appointment of a person who served in the police force as a
Member of the N.H.R.C. is contrary to the provisions of the
Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993, (the Act), apart from being
opposed to the very aims and objects for which the said
Commission was constituted. The petitioner urges that such
appointment
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.