The judgment was primarily based on the appeal filed by Arshnoor Singh against the decision of the lower court. The Supreme Court examined the procedural aspects related to the delay in filing the application for substitution, which was condoned, and any abatement was set aside. The Court considered whether the appeal was maintainable and whether the procedural requirements had been satisfied. Ultimately, the Court allowed the appeal, which indicates that the judgment was grounded on the principles of procedural justice, proper substitution of parties, and the merits of the case as presented in the appeal (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) .

REVISED

ITEM NO.1503 COURT NO.6 SECTION IV

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Civil Appeal No(s).5124/2019

(Arising out of SLP (C) No.6788 of 2019)

ARSHNOOR SINGH APPELLANT(S)

VERSUS

HARPAL KAUR & ORS. RESPONDENT(S)

Date : 01-07-2019 This appeal was called on for pronouncement of

Judgment today.

For Appellant(s)

Mr.Manoj Swarup, Sr.Adv.

Mr.Ankit Swarup, Adv.

Ms.Vidisha Swarup, Adv.

Mr.Jawad Tariq, Adv.

Ms.Mansi Jain, Adv.

For Respondent(s)

Mr.Aabhas Kshetarpal, Adv.

Mr.Siddhartha Jha, AOR

Mr.Anuj Bhandari, Adv.

Hon’ble Ms.Justice Indu Malhotra pronounced the

judgment for the Bench comprising Hon’ble Mr.Justice Uday

Umesh Lalit and Her ladyship.

Delay in filing application for substitution is

condoned and abatement, if any, is set aside.

Application for substitution is allowed.

Leave granted.

The appeal is allowed in terms of signed Reportable

Judgment.

Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.

(Ashok Raj Singh) (Cha