Justice Jarat Kumar Jain Member (Judicial), Mr. Balvinder Singh Member (Technical), Mr. V. P. Singh Member (Technical)
Narendra Kumar Agarwal & Anr – Appellant
Versus
Monotrone Leasing Pvt Ltd & Anr – Respondent
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 549 of 2020 1 of 12
NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 549 of 2020
[Arising out of Impugned Order dated 12th March 2020 passed by the
Adjudicating Authority/National Company Law Tribunal, Kolkata Bench,
Kolkata in Company Petition (IB) No.188/KB/2019]
IN THE MATTER OF:
1.
Narendra Kumar Agarwal
391 Block-G
New Alipore
Kolkata – 700053
Appellant No.1
2.
Suman Agarwal
391 Block-G
New Alipore
Kolkata – 700053
Appellant No.2
Versus
1.
Monotrone Leasing Private Limited
Oriental House
6C, Elgin Road
Kolkata – 700020
Respondent No.1
2.
Bimal Kanti Chowdhry IRP
77A/50 Raja S.C. Mullick Road
8, SPB Block
Kolkata – 700020
Respondent No.2
Present:
For Appellant
: Mr Abhijeet Sinha, Ms Suhita Mukhopadhyay and
Mr Abhirup Chatterjee, Advocates.
For Respondent
: Mr Charu Tyagi, Advocate
Mr Bimal Kanti Choudhary, Advocate for (R-2 RP)
Mr Rishav Banerjee, Advocate for R-2.
Mr Sanjay Kapur, Mr. VM Kannan and
Ms Megha Karnwal, for SBI.
J U D G M E N T
[Per; V. P. Singh, Member (T)]
This Appeal emanates from the Impugned Order dated 12th March 2020
passed by the Adjudicating Authority/National Company Law Tribunal,
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 549 of 2020 2 of 12
Kolkata Bench, Kolkata in Company Petition (IB) No. 188/KB/2019, whereby
the Adjudicating Authority has admitted the Application under Section 7 of
the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (in short 'I&B Code'). The Parties
are represented by their original status in the Company Petition for the sake
of convenience.
2.
These brief facts of the case as per petitioner are as follows:
The Applicant/Respondent granted an inter-corporate loan of Rs.25
lacs for 90 days to the Corporate Debtor, which was repayable with 15%
interest per annum. The Applicant remitted the said amount by transferring
the fund to the corporate debtor acknowledged by the corporate debtor. The
Corporate Debtor duly paid an aggregate of Rs.2,69,075/- from 14th June
2017 to 31st March 2018. Since 01st April 2018, the Corporate Debtor failed
and neglected to pay the outstanding loan amount. Thereupon the
Applicant/Financial Creditor raised the demand. In response to that, the
Corporate Debtor issued two cheques bearing No.806211 drawn on HDFC
Bank dated 11th June 2018 for Rs.25 lacs and Cheque No.806210 drawn on
HDFC Bank. But the Bank dishonoured both the cheques. The Applicant
contends that the Corporate Debtor has committed default as on 20th January
2018 for a sum of Rs.28,03,083/- which includes the principal and interest.
3.
The Adjudicating Authority admitted the petition by its order dated 12th
March 2020, which is under challenge in this Appeal. The Appeal is filed
mainly on the ground that;
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 549 of 2020 3 of 12
"the Financial Creditor has failed to show that it had
necessary Board approval before the disbursement of the
alleged loan.
the Financial Creditor has failed to establish any financial
contract between the parties. The oral agreement and
payment of TDS cannot be taken as proof of financial debt.
the alleged oral contract does not establish debt; the same
would be like the inter-corporate deposit, which is distinct
from a loan and would not fall within the definition of
financial debt.
the Financial Creditor has failed to make out a case of
default. In the absence of default, no application under
Section 7 can be admitted. The date of default is crucial to
determine the date on which the cause of action accrued.
A bare reading of Form-I shows that no date of default has
b
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.