SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Justice Venugopal M Member (Judicial), Mr. Kanthi Narahari Member (Technical)
Mohan Lal Dhakad – Appellant
Versus
BNG Global India Ltd – Respondent
Company Appeal (AT)(Insolvency) No.684 of 2020
Page | 1
NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
COMPANY APPEAL (AT)(Insolvency) No.684 of 2020
(Under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 read with
Section 421 of the Companies Act, 2013)
(Arising out of Order dated 12.3.2020 passed by the National Company Law
Tribunal, New Delhi Bench in Company Petition No. (IB)2978(ND)/2019)
IN THE MATTER OF :
Mr.MOHANLAL DHAKAD
R O 15, Vill : Sikhedi,Po Badwan
….. Appellant
The & Dist, Mandsaur,
Madhya Pradesh 458 667
Versus
BNG GLOBAL INDIA LIMITED,
Having its Registered Office at:
GD ITL A-09, Northex Tower,
5th Floor, 504, Netaji Subhash Place,
Pitambura, New Delhi 110034.
…Respondent
Present:
For Appellant:
Ms. Ranjana Roy Gawai &
Mr.Avinash Bhati, Advocates
For Respondent:
None
J U D G E M E N T
Venugopal M.J
Preface
The ‘Appellant’ has filed the present appeal being
dissatisfied with the order dated 12.3.2020 passed by the ‘Adjudicating
Authority’ (National Company Law Tribunal), New Delhi Bench-V in
(IB)2978(ND)/2019.
Company Appeal (AT)(Insolvency) No.684 of 2020
Page | 2
2.
The ‘Adjudicating Authority’ (National Company Law
Tribunal), New Delhi Bench-V, while passing the ‘Impugned Order on
12.3.2020 in (IB)2978/ND/2019 filed by the ‘Appellant’/’Financial
Creditor’ and others (under Section 7 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy
Code) read with Rule 4 of Insolvency & Bankruptcy (Application to the
‘Adjudicating Authority’ )Rules 2016, at Paragraphs 6 to 9, among other
things had observed the following:
….” If we shall read the provisions contained under
Section 73, 74 and 76 of the Companies Act along
with (Acceptance of Deposits) Rule, 2014, then it can
be said that all these provisions have come into force
with effect from 01st April, 2014 and in view of the
aforesaid provisions after commencement of this Act,
no company can in view, accept or renew deposit in
this Act from the public except in the manner
provided in this Chapter and a special provision is
made regarding the repayment of the deposited
amount which was deposited prior to the enforcement
of this Section and as per Section 74(1)(b), the
company is liable to repay the amount within 3 years
from such commencement on or before expiry of the
period from which the deposit is accepted, whichever
is earlier and if the company fails to repay the amount
then there is a penal provision U/S 74(3) of the
Companies Act, 2013. Here, in the case as we have
Company Appeal (AT)(Insolvency) No.684 of 2020
Page | 3
already
held
that
the
‘Financial
Creditors’
everywhere mentioned the word ‘deposit’, therefore,
the amount which he has deposited with the
Corporate Debtor does not come within the purview
of the definition of Financial Debt rather the Financial
Creditors, admittedly, deposited the amount with the
Corporate Debtor and in lieu of that he was getting
interest from the Corporate Debtor, therefore, he can
claim the refund under Chapter V of the Companies
Act, read with Companies Act, read with Company
(Acceptance of Deposits) Rule, 2014.
So far, the initiation of proceedings under Section 7
of the Code is concerned, in our view, is not liable to
be accepted. At this juncture, we would also like to
refer the arguments of the applicants that there is a
default in payment of debt, therefore, Section 7
application is maintainable. At this juncture, we
would like to refer the definition of default as defined
in Section 3(12) of the Code:
Section 3(12)
(12) “default” means non-payment of debt when
whole or any part or instalment of the amount of
debt has become due and payable and is not
1[paid] by the debtor or the corporate debtor, as
the case may be”
Company Appeal (AT)(Insolvency) No.684 of 2020
Page | 4
8.
Mere plain reading of the provisions show
that def