D.K. JAIN,H.L. DATTU, , ,
NARAYAN CHANDRA GHOSH – Appellant
Versus
UCO BANK . – Respondent
Reportable
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2681 OF 2011
[Arising out of S.L.P. (C) No. 5488 of 2011]
Narayan Chandra Ghosh
—
Appellant (s)
VERSUS
UCO Bank & Ors.
—
Respondent (s)
O R D E R
1.
Leave granted.
2.
This appeal by the borrower is directed against judgment dated 7th
December, 2010 delivered by the High Court of Calcutta in C.O.
No.3608 of 2009. By the impugned judgment, the High Court has set
aside the order passed by the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal,
Kolkata (for short, “the Appellate Tribunal”) in Appeal No.35 of
2009, whereby the Appellate Tribunal, while allowing the application
filed by the appellant under Section 18(1) of the Securitisation and
Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security
Interest Act, 2002 (for short, “the Act”) had exempted the appellant
from making any deposit in terms of second proviso to Section 18 of
the Act before entertaining the appeal against the order passed by the
Debts Recovery Tribunal.
3.
With the consent of learned counsel for the appellant as also the
respondent-bank, which is on caveat, we have heard the matter finally
at the motion he
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.