ARIJIT PASAYAT,S.H. KAPADIA
GURPAL SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB . – Respondent
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Page 1 of 5
CASE NO.:
Appeal (civil) 2802-2803 of 2002
PETITIONER:
Gurpal Singh
RESPONDENT:
State of Punjab & Ors
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/05/2005
BENCH:
ARIJIT PASAYAT & S.H. KAPADIA
JUDGMENT:
J U D G M E N T
ARIJIT PASAYAT, J.
By the impugned judgment a Division Bench of the Punjab
and Haryana High Court held that the appointment of the
appellant as Auction Recorder of the Market Committee,
Patran was invalid and illegal. The said order came to be
passed on the basis of a Writ Petition filed by respondent
No. 4. It is to be noted that the said petition was styled
as a Public Interest Litigation (in short ’PIL’).
A brief reference to the factual aspect would be
necessary.
Appellant was appointed as Auction Recorder on
19.11.1986. Appointment of the appellant was challenged by
one Ashok Kumar, clerk of the Market Committee by filing a
complaint before the competent authority alleging that the
appellant having been convicted under Section 61(1)(a) of
Punjab Excise Act in 1974 for alleged commission of offence
on 21.5.1973 and was therefore ineligible for being
considered for appointment. The complaint w
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.