SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

RAMU – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates:
SURYA KANT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

S.L.P (CRIMINAL) NO................ OF 2017

(Arising out of Crl.M.P. No.4891 of 2017)

Ramu & another

.…Petitioners

VERSUS

State of U.P.

....Respondent

O R D E R

Delay condoned.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and perused

the order impugned rejecting the prayer for their release on bail

pending disposal of their appeal against their conviction under

Sections 148, 302 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code

recorded by the Trial Court by its judgment and order dated

20.01.2007. Noticeably, the incident is of 22.09.2005 and the

appeal filed by the petitioners against their conviction is of

the year 2007.

On a consideration of the materials on record to the extent

necessary at this stage and qua the prayer for bail, we are not

inclined to interfere with the order impugned. However, having

regard to the insistent plea on behalf of the petitioners to

indicate a time frame for the disposal of the appeal, we request

the High Court, having regard to the singular facts and

1

Digitally signed by

DEEPAK MANSUKHANI

Date: 2017.04.05

16:59:16 IST

Reason:

Signature Not Verified

cir

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top