SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

KAILASAM,P.S.
JIT RAM SHIV KUMAR & ORS ETC. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


Advocates:
PREM MALHOTRARAJINDER NARAIN & CO.

http://JUDIS.NIC.IN

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Page 1 of 33

PETITIONER:

JIT RAM SHIV KUMAR AND ORS. ETC.

Vs.

RESPONDENT:

STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. ETC.

DATE OF JUDGMENT16/04/1980

BENCH:

KAILASAM, P.S.

BENCH:

KAILASAM, P.S.

FAZALALI, SYED MURTAZA

CITATION:

1980 AIR 1285 1980 SCR (3) 689

1981 SCC (1) 11

CITATOR INFO :

R 1983 SC 848 (10)

O 1986 SC 806 (12,13)

RF 1986 SC 872 (181)

E 1991 SC 14 (11)

ACT:

Punjab Municipal Act, 1911 as amended by Punjab Act 48

of 1953, Section 62A-Power of State Government to direct the

Municipality to impose any tax under section 61-Exemption

from payment of octroi duty not within the competence of the

Municipality and ultra vires of its powers-Whether any such

act which is void ab initio, enforceable-Principle of

Promissory Estoppel, ingredients of-Applicability to the

instant case.

HEADNOTE:

The Municipal Committee of Bahadurgarh, respondent No.

2 established Mandi Fateh in Bahadurgarh Town with a view to

improve trade in the area. The Municipal Committee decided

that the purchasers of the plots for sale in the Mandi would

not be required to pay octroi dut

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top