SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

VINAYAK NARAYAN DEOSTHALI – Appellant
Versus
C.B.I. – Respondent


Advocates:
KAMINI JAISWALARVIND KUMAR SHARMA

1

REPORTABLE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 335 OF 2005

VINAYAK NARAYAN DEOSTHALI

APPELLANT

VERSUS

CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

RESPONDENT

JUDGMENT

N.V. RAMANA, J.

This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 3rd

December, 2004 of the Special Court (Trial of offences relating to

transactions in Securities) at Bombay in Special Case No. 3 of 1995

whereby the Special Judge convicted and sentenced the appellant for

the offences under Sections 409/120B, 403, 477-A/109, IPC and

Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of

Corruption Act, 1988.

2.

The prosecution story, briefly stated, is that during the year

1991, the appellant (accused No.1) while he was working as

Digitally signed by

Neeta Sapra

Date: 2015.01.12

14:46:14 IST

Reason:

Signature Not Verified

2

Assistant Manager in the Securities Department of UCO Bank,

Hamam Street Branch, Mumbai in connivance with a colleague of the

Bank (accused No. 2) hatched a criminal conspiracy with the

infamous share & stock broker of Bombay of those times, Harshad S.

Mehta (accused No. 3) with the object of cheating

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top