SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

MISRA,R.B. (J)
BRAHMVART SANATHAN DHARAM MAHAMANDAL, KANPUR & ORS. – Appellant
Versus
PREM KUMAR & ORS. – Respondent


Advocates:

http://JUDIS.NIC.IN

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Page 1 of 10

PETITIONER:

BRAHMVART SANATHAN DHARAM MAHAMANDAL, KANPUR & ORS.

Vs.

RESPONDENT:

PREM KUMAR & ORS.

DATE OF JUDGMENT10/05/1985

BENCH:

MISRA, R.B. (J)

BENCH:

MISRA, R.B. (J)

REDDY, O. CHINNAPPA (J)

CITATION:

1985 AIR 1102 1985 SCR Supl. (1) 718

1985 SCC (3) 350 1985 SCALE (1)1058

ACT:

Hindu Law-Right of the limited owners to alienate the

joint estate of a propositus during their life time after

division of the property in equal shares and coming into

possession thereof, without the consent of the other co-

owners-Consequences of the alienations made-Whether passes

title to the successive alienness entitling them to

protection under section 43 and 51 of the Transfer of

Property Act-Doctrine of "feeding the grant by estoppel",

and "Deemed consent"- Supreme Court will not, in an appeal

interfere with the discretionary power of the High Court to

evaluate the evidence.

HEADNOTE:

One Lala Gurdin, who had acquired extensive landed

property in Kanpur died on December 10, 1861 leaving behind

his widow Smt. Amrit Kuer and three daughters: Smt. Hazarao

K

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top