SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

THAKKAR,M.P. (J)
BHARWADA BHOGINBHAI HIRJIBHAI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Advocates:

http://JUDIS.NIC.IN

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Page 1 of 11

PETITIONER:

BHARWADA BHOGINBHAI HIRJIBHAI

Vs.

RESPONDENT:

STATE OF GUJARAT

DATE OF JUDGMENT24/05/1983

BENCH:

THAKKAR, M.P. (J)

BENCH:

THAKKAR, M.P. (J)

SEN, A.P. (J)

CITATION:

1983 AIR 753 1983 SCR (3) 280

1983 SCC (3) 217 1983 SCALE (1)665

CITATOR INFO :

RF 1988 SC 696 (10,14)

R 1988 SC1883 (247)

R 1989 SC1890 (27)

R 1990 SC 658 (14,19)

ACT:

Constitution of India, 1950, Article 136 read with

order XXI of the Supreme Court Rules, 7966-Concurrent

finding of fact, when can be reopened by the Supreme Court

in an appeal by Special Leave, explained.

Evidence - Reappreciation of evidence in the context of

minor discrepancies, explained.

Evidence-Corroborative evidence in rape cases-Whether,

when and to what extent corroboration to the testimony of a

victim of rape is essential to establish the charge.

HEADNOTE:

The appellant, a government servant employed in the

Sachivalaya at Gandhinagar was found guilty, by the Sessions

Judge, Mehsna, of serious charges of sexual misbehaviour

with two young girls (aged about

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top