BHAGWATI, P.N. (CJ),VENKATARAMIAH, E.S. (J),KHALID, V. (J),OZA, G.L. (J),NATRAJAN, S. (J)
SHEO NANDAN PASWAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. – Respondent
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Page 1 of 70
PETITIONER:
SHEO NANDAN PASWAN
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.
DATE OF JUDGMENT20/12/1986
BENCH:
BHAGWATI, P.N. (CJ)
BENCH:
BHAGWATI, P.N. (CJ)
VENKATARAMIAH, E.S. (J)
KHALID, V. (J)
OZA, G.L. (J)
NATRAJAN, S. (J)
CITATION:
1987 AIR 877 1987 SCR (1) 702
1987 SCC (1) 288 JT 1986 1132
1986 SCALE (2)1099
CITATOR INFO :
R 1987 SC 863 (31)
R 1988 SC1531 (191)
RF 1992 SC 248 (44)
RF 1992 SC 604 (114,140)
ACT:
Review of judgments or orders by the Supreme
Court--Constitution of India, 1950, Article-137 read with
Rule 1 of order XL of the Supreme Court Rules, 1966--Nature
of the power of Review by the Supreme Court--Whether the
Supreme Court could interfere with the granting consent
orders for "Nolles Prosequi" against the accused, when the
orders of the Special Judge, of the High Court in Revision,
and of the majority of the Judges of the Supreme Court in an
appeal by special leave, were in favour of the accused.
Review order is to the effect "the review petition
should be admitted and the appeal should be re
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.