SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SHARAD KUMAR SANGHI – Appellant
Versus
SANGITA RANE – Respondent


Advocates:
A. V. RANGAMMANJEET KIRPAL

p 1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1584 OF 2007

Sharad Kumar Sanghi ... Appellant

VERSUS

Sangita Rane ... Respondent

JUDGMENT

DIPAK MISRA, J.

Calling in question the legal validity of the order dated

30.11.2006 passed by the learned Single Judge of the High

Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur in M.Cr.C.No.1922 of

2002 whereby the learned Judge had declined to exercise the

power under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure

(Cr.P.C.) for quashing of the proceedings in Criminal Case

No.895 of 2001 pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate

First Class, Betul which has been registered under Section 420

of the Indian Penal Code against the appellant, the present

Signature Not Verified

appeal has been preferred b

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top