SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

JAGTAR SINGH @ JAGDEV SINGH – Appellant
Versus
SANJEEV KUMAR – Respondent


Advocates:
YASH PAL DHINGRARAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

ORDER

The office report is that the appellant and the respondents have failed to file the statement of case, although they were notified to do so by notice dated 21.8.2014 of the Registry. Order XIX Rule 32 of the Supreme Court Rules,2013 provides that if the appellant does not file a statement of case within the time, as provided for in sub rule (1), it shall be presumed that the appellant has adopted the list of dates/synopsis containing chronology of events as filed at the time of presentation of petition for seeking special leave to appeal (SLP)/Appeal, as Digitally signed by Madhu Grover Date: 2015.03.26 06:07:36 CET Reason:

    Signature Not Verified statement of case,and does not desire to file any further statement of case. The order further provides that if the respondent who has entered appearance does not file a statement of case within the time, as provided in Sub Rule(1) (i.e. 35 days) it shall be presumed that he does not desire to lodge the same. In view of the rule position cited above the matter shall be processed for time, as provided in Sub Rule(1) (i.e. 35 days) it shall be presumed that he

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top