SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

REDDY,O. CHINNAPPA (J)
VIJAY NARAIN SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. – Respondent


Advocates:

http://JUDIS.NIC.IN

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Page 1 of 19

PETITIONER:

VIJAY NARAIN SINGH

Vs.

RESPONDENT:

STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.

DATE OF JUDGMENT12/04/1984

BENCH:

REDDY, O. CHINNAPPA (J)

BENCH:

REDDY, O. CHINNAPPA (J)

SEN, A.P. (J)

VENKATARAMIAH, E.S. (J)

CITATION:

1984 AIR 1334 1984 SCR (3) 435

1984 SCC (3) 14 1984 SCALE (1)736

CITATOR INFO :

D 1986 SC2173 (12,13,14,16)

RF 1986 SC2177 (44)

R 1988 SC1256 (12)

R 1989 SC 364 (8,9,11)

RF 1989 SC2265 (17)

F 1990 SC2069 (5)

RF 1991 SC1640 (11,12)

ACT:

Bihar Control of Crimes Act 1981-Section 12 read with

section 2 (d). For preventive detention under section 12

authorities must be satisfied that the person to be detained

is anti-social element as defined in section 1(d).

Bihar Control of Crimes Act, 1981-Section 2 (d)-

Definition of ’antisocial element’-Interpretation of

expression ’habitually’ in sub-clause (i), (ii) and (iv)-

Meaning of.

Interpretation of statutes-Rule of-Law of preventive

detention must be strictly construed.

Practice-When person enlarged on bail by competent

cri

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top