SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
FAZALALI,SYED MURTAZA
THE MANAGING BOARD OF THE MILLI TALIMI MISSION, BIHAR,RANCH – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. – Respondent
/ 0
14-08-1984
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Page 1 of 15
PETITIONER:
THE MANAGING BOARD OF THE MILLI TALIMI MISSION, BIHAR,RANCHI
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.
DATE OF JUDGMENT14/08/1984
BENCH:
FAZALALI, SYED MURTAZA
BENCH:
FAZALALI, SYED MURTAZA
VARADARAJAN, A. (J)
MUKHARJI, SABYASACHI (J)
CITATION:
1984 AIR 1757 1985 SCR (1) 410
1984 SCC (4) 500 1984 SCALE (2)251
ACT:
Right of minority educational institution-Right to get
affiliation from the Universities-Whether the right to
affiliation or to obtain aid from the Government is a
fundamental right so as to violate Article 30-Whether the
refusal to give affiliation by the statutory authorities in
the instant case without just and sufficient cause amounts
to violation of Article 30 of the Constitution or simply an
arbitrary and illegal action-Supreme Court can award costs
against a State for disobedience of the orders of the Court
to produce documents called for and for failure to perform
constitutional duties by institutions.
HEADNOTE:
The appellant-Institution was started as a Teachers
Training College under a Society which was established as
far back as 1972, though the college itself was established
and started in July 1977. On 22.9.1977 the institution made
an application to the Government for grant of affiliation or
recognition of the same in response to which a most
extraordinary order was passed by the Government directing
the University for refusing affiliation on the strange
ground that all proposals for affiliation by the non-
Government Teachers Training Colleges be rejected and that
no student be allowed to appear as a private candidate. How
ever, since the above decision was not applicable to
minority institutions which was reiterated by a latter
ordinance called Bihar non-Government Teachers Training
College ordinance on June 5, 1978, it was incumbent on the
institution to prove that it was a minority institution
before it could be granted affiliation, on 24.2.1978 the
appellants filed an application before the Ranchi University
for grant of affiliation on June 15, 1978, the Government
wrote to the Ranchi University for inspection of the
appellants college. On 6.2.1980. Joint Secretary to the
Government of Bihar sent letter to the Ranchi University and
the Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi for inspection of the
appellants’ college. Although the institution applied for
affiliation in 1978 and claimed to be a minority institution
which was never disputed at any point of time the Government
took three years to take a decision about affiliation of the
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Page 2 of 15
appellants’ college. On 5.3.1980, the University Authorities
inspected the appellants’ college and recommended its
affiliation which was followed by a report by the District
Development officer, Ranchi on 30.6.1980 recommending
affiliation. But, despite these facts no final decision was
taken by the Government as a result of which the appellants
had to move the High Court for directing the Government to
grant affiliation. On the High Court’s direction to the
Government to decide recognition and affiliation
411
the appellants’ college within a specified time, on
3.11.1980, the Government granted recognition and approval
for affiliation for three sessions only, i.e. 1977-78, 1978-
79 and 1979-80. On 10.11.1980, the University wrote to the
Government recommending further grant of affiliation to the
appellants’ college. On 22.11.1980 the appellants applied
for grant of permanent affiliation. But, somehow or the
other, on 27.11.1980 for undisclosed reasons, the Government
passed a strange-order cancelling the recognition and
approval for affiliation granted to the appellants’ college
vide its letter dated 3.11.1980. This order was challenged
befo