SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

VADIRAJ NAGGAPPA VERNEKAR (D) TH. LRS. – Appellant
Versus
SHARAD CHAND PRABHAKAR GOGATE – Respondent


Advocates:
SHIVAJI M. JADHAV

VADIRAJ NAGGAPPA VERNEKAR (D) THROUGH LRS.

V.

SHARAD CHAND PRABHAKAR GOGATE

Civil Appeal No. 1172 of 2009

FEBRUARY 24, 2009

[ALTAMAS KABIR AND CYRIAC JOSEPH, JJ.]

The Judgement of the Court was delivered by

ALTAMAS KABIR, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. The short question for decision in this appeal is whether a witness having

been examined by way of affidavit evidence can be recalled for giving further

evidence with regard to facts not mentioned in the affidavit.

3. The aforesaid question arises in respect of a suit filed by one Vadiraj

Naggappa Vernekar and Smt. Mainabai Ranade, being Suit No. S.925 of 1990,

before the learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court, seeking a declaration

that the Letters of Administration obtained by one Sharadchandra Prabhakar Gogate

on 5

th November, 1998, in respect of the estate of Dr. Sudha Gogate, was not

binding on the plaintiffs or any of them and did not affect their right, title and interest

in the suit property, being Flat no.402, situated in Amogh Vikram Cooperative

Housing Society Ltd., Murari Ghag Marg, Prabhadevi, Bombay 400025. Vadiraj

Naggappa Vernekar died during the pendency of the suit and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top