SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

MUKHARJI,SABYASACHI (J)
CHANDAVARKAR SITA RATNA RAO – Appellant
Versus
ASHALATA S. GURAM – Respondent


Advocates:

http://JUDIS.NIC.IN

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Page 1 of 29

PETITIONER:

CHANDAVARKAR SITA RATNA RAO

Vs.

RESPONDENT:

ASHALATA S. GURAM

DATE OF JUDGMENT25/09/1986

BENCH:

MUKHARJI, SABYASACHI (J)

BENCH:

MUKHARJI, SABYASACHI (J)

SINGH, K.N. (J)

CITATION:

1987 AIR 117 1986 SCR (3) 866

1986 SCC (4) 447 JT 1986 619

1986 SCALE (2)500

CITATOR INFO :

R 1987 SC1939 (31)

RF 1988 SC 782 (57)

R 1990 SC1563 (11)

F 1991 SC1494 (8,13,14,16)

RF 1991 SC1760 (21)

RF 1992 SC 81 (11)

RF&E 1992 SC1701 (36)

ACT:

Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging Rates Control Act,

1947; ss. 14(2) & 15A-Whether and how far statutory tenant

governed by the Act could have created a valid licence

before 1st February, 1973.

Constitution of India, Article 227-Finding of facts-

Scope and ambit of jurisdiction of High Court to interfere.

Statutory interpretation.

Non-obstante clause ’notwithstanding anything

contained.. ’-Expression contained in statute-Meaning of-

Court to find out what is legal not what is right.

Mischief rule-Applicability of-Literal construction and

rea

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top