SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

C.M.GIRISH BABU – Appellant
Versus
CBI, COCHIN, HIGH COURT OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
VIJAY KUMARB. KRISHNA PRASAD

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 377 OF 2009

(Arising out of SLP(Crl) No.578 of 2008)

C.M. Girish Babu

…Appellant

Versus

CBI, Cochin, High Court of Kerala …Respondent

J U D G M E N T

B.SUDERSHAN REDDY,J.

Leave granted.

2.

The appellant along with Accused No.1 was tried for

offences under Section 120B of IPC read with Section 7 and

13 (2) read with 13(1) (d) of Prevention of Corruption Act,

1988 (hereinafter referred to as “the said Act”) by Special

Judge (SPE/CBI)-I, Ernakulam who by his judgment dated 30th

March, 2002 convicted the appellant for the offence punishable

under Section 7 read with Section 13(1) (d) and 13(2) of the

said Act. He was acquitted of the charge under Section 120B

of the IPC. The appellant was accordingly sentenced to

undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years and to pay a

fine of Rs.20,000. In default for payment of fine the appellant

was further ordered to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a

further period of six months for the offence punishable under

Section 13(1) read with Section 13(2) of the said Act. He was

also sentenced to undergo rigorous impri

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top